004

4:136
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا آمِنُوا بِاللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ وَالْكِتَابِ الَّذِي نَزَّلَ عَلَىٰ رَسُولِهِ وَالْكِتَابِ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ مِن قَبْلُ وَمَن يَكْفُرْ بِاللَّهِ وَمَلَائِكَتِهِ وَكُتُبِهِ وَرُسُلِهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ فَقَدْ ضَلَّ ضَلَالًا بَعِيدًا
Believe the Bible

4:156
وَبِكُفْرِهِمْ وَقَوْلِهِمْ عَلَىٰ مَرْيَمَ بُهْتَانًا عَظِيمًا
and because of those disbelieving and of those speaking against Marym a tremendous calumny

4:157-158
and for their saying: "Indeed, we Romans condemned Eucharist." but the Romans didn't condemn Eucharist nor did they crucify Eucharist, only Eucharist's Shubiha (Nephesh AlRahman Muhammad Abdullah the Son of Man) before them. And lo those who debate concerning it are in assumption thereof. They have no idea what they are talking about and are only regurgitating nonsense. But the Romans did not kill Eucharist.
Nay, the Father raised Eucharist towards Him. And the Father is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
وَقَوْلِهِمْ إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا الْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَٰكِن شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ وَإِنَّ الَّذِينَ اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ لَفِي شَكٍّ مِّنْهُ مَا لَهُم بِهِ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِلَّا اتِّبَاعَ الظَّنِّ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينًا
بَل رَّفَعَهُ اللَّهُ إِلَيْهِ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ عَزِيزًا حَكِيمًا
Commentary
Just as discussed in Hebrews 5:7 and as Yesod said, "no one takes my life from me" (John 10:18) and Paul added "the Judaeans killed the Lord" (1Thess2:14-15) (to say anyone other than the Judaeans killed the Rasulallah's appearance is unbiblical) so too this Ayah makes the same distinction between the Eucharist (Yesod) and its appearance (the Lord) by referring to the speaker as the Messiah Ieso ibn Marym Rasul Allah while his Shubiha (Mahmed) to us is his appearance the Lord. Nestorians would insist that his Appearance (which they call ibn Marym) was entirely human while his essence (which they call AlMasih) was purely divine but Monophysites insist that although his Shubiha to us is distinct from his essence AlMasih, that in turn should not be distinguished from ibn Marym which the essence really is. Although no one took the Yesod's life from him, it is clear that his Shubiha to us was indeed killed (crucified). Messias Yesod only permitted his own death on a cross at the hands of Judaean malpractice (not Roman law) by his own free acceptance of God's will over his own Nephesh. Christians focus only on the murder of his appearance while Muslims focus only on the inviolable dignity of his essence. On an even deeper level however, Ruhallah did not die at all but simply retreated into the Amir/Chochmah (the Father's Hands).
=======
4:171
يَا أَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ لاَ تَغْلُواْ فِي دِينِكُمْ وَلاَ تَقُولُواْ عَلَى اللّهِ إِلاَّ الْحَقِّ
O Romans, don't go to extremes in your religion nor speak about the Father less than the truth.
إِنَّمَا الْمَسِيحُ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ
رَسُولُ اللّهِ
وَكَلِمَتُهُ أَلْقَاهَا إِلَى مَرْيَمَ
وَرُوحٌ مِّنْهُ
Verily the Messiah Jesu ibn Marym (Messias Yesod) is
the Father's Priest (Eucharist),
the Father's Word (Adam Kadmon) which He conveyed unto Marym
and Spirit from the Father.
فَآمِنُواْ بِاللّهِ وَرُسُلِهِ وَلاَ تَقُولُواْ ثَلاَثَةٌ انتَهُواْ خَيْرًا لَّكُمْ إِنَّمَا اللّهُ إِلَـهٌ وَاحِدٌ
So believe in the Father and his Priest (Eucharist) and don't preach Tritheism, cease, 'tis better for you.
The Father is ONE god.
سُبْحَانَهُ
Be he praised! 
أَن يَكُونَ لَهُ وَلَدٌ 
Not became to Him any Seed as the Arians & Collyridians say
لَّهُ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَات وَمَا فِي الأَرْضِ وَكَفَى بِاللّهِ وَكِيلاً
To Him is whatsoever is in the Heavens and whatsoever is in the Earth. But saying a guardian IN the Father is sufficient.


===
4:172

لَّن يَسْتَنكِفَ الْمَسِيحُ أَن يَكُونَ عَبْدًا لِّلَّهِ وَلَا الْمَلَائِكَةُ الْمُقَرَّبُونَ وَمَن يَسْتَنكِفْ عَنْ عِبَادَتِهِ وَيَسْتَكْبِرْ فَسَيَحْشُرُهُمْ إِلَيْهِ جَمِيعًا

The Messiah is Allah's Servant but is different from the other angels.

No comments:

Post a comment

Your comment will be dealt with as soon as possible.