004

4:157-158
and for their saying: "Indeed, we Romans condemned Yesod." but the Romans didn't really condemn him nor did they crucify him, only his Shubiha (Nephesh AlRahman Muhammad Abdullah the Son of Man) before them. And lo those who debate concerning it are in assumption thereof. Nothing is in it for them from science except following the theory. But the Romans condemned Yesod not really.
Nay, the Father raised Yesod towards Him. And the Father is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
وَقَوْلِهِمْ إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا الْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَٰكِن شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ وَإِنَّ الَّذِينَ اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ لَفِي شَكٍّ مِّنْهُ مَا لَهُم بِهِ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِلَّا اتِّبَاعَ الظَّنِّ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينًا
بَل رَّفَعَهُ اللَّهُ إِلَيْهِ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ عَزِيزًا حَكِيمًا
Commentary
Just as Yedod said, "no one takes my life from me" (John 10:18) and Paul added "the Judaeans killed the Lord" (1Thess2:14-15) (to say anyone other than the Judaeans killed the Rasulallah's appearance is unbiblical) so too this Ayah makes the same distinction between the speaker (Yesod) and his appearance (the Lord) by referring to the speaker as the Messiah Jesu ibn Marym Rasul Allah while his Shubiha (Mahmed) to us is his appearance the Lord. Nestorians would insist that his Appearance (which they call ibn Marym) was entirely human while his essence (which they call AlMasih) was purely divine but Monophysites insist that although his Shubiha to us is distinct from his essence AlMasih, that in turn should not be distinguished from ibn Marym which the essence really is. Although no one took the Yesod's life from him, it is clear that his Shubiha to us was indeed killed (crucified). Messias Yesod only permitted his own death on a cross at the hands of Judaean malpractice (not Roman law) by his own free acceptance of God's will over his own Nephesh. Christians focus only on the murder of his appearance while Muslims focus only on the inviolable dignity of his essence. On an even deeper level however, Ruhallah did not die at all but simply retreated into the Amir/Chochmah (the Father's Hands).
=======
4:171
يَا أَهْلَ الْكِتَابِ لاَ تَغْلُواْ فِي دِينِكُمْ وَلاَ تَقُولُواْ عَلَى اللّهِ إِلاَّ الْحَقِّ
O Romans, don't go to extremes in your religion nor speak about the Father less than the truth.
إِنَّمَا الْمَسِيحُ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ
رَسُولُ اللّهِ
وَكَلِمَتُهُ أَلْقَاهَا إِلَى مَرْيَمَ
وَرُوحٌ مِّنْهُ
Verily the Messiah Jesu ibn Marym (Messias Yesod) is
the Father's Priest (Eucharist),
the Father's Word (Adam Kadmon) which He conveyed unto Marym
and Spirit from the Father.
فَآمِنُواْ بِاللّهِ وَرُسُلِهِ وَلاَ تَقُولُواْ ثَلاَثَةٌ انتَهُواْ خَيْرًا لَّكُمْ إِنَّمَا اللّهُ إِلَـهٌ وَاحِدٌ
So believe in the Father and his Priest (Eucharist) and don't preach Tritheism, cease, 'tis better for you.
The Father is ONE god.
سُبْحَانَهُ
Be he praised! 
أَن يَكُونَ لَهُ وَلَدٌ 
Not became to Him any Seed as the Arians & Collyridians say
لَّهُ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَات وَمَا فِي الأَرْضِ وَكَفَى بِاللّهِ وَكِيلاً
To Him is whatsoever is in the Heavens and whatsoever is in the Earth. But saying a guardian IN the Father is sufficient.


===
4:172

لَّن يَسْتَنكِفَ الْمَسِيحُ أَن يَكُونَ عَبْدًا لِّلَّهِ وَلَا الْمَلَائِكَةُ الْمُقَرَّبُونَ وَمَن يَسْتَنكِفْ عَنْ عِبَادَتِهِ وَيَسْتَكْبِرْ فَسَيَحْشُرُهُمْ إِلَيْهِ جَمِيعًا

The Messiah is Allah's Servant but is different from the other angels.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your comment will be dealt with as soon as possible.